← Back to Blog
London Property Market: A Factor-Model History Part 1 of 3 — Brexit to Pre-COVID (2016–2019)  |  Part 2: The COVID Boom (2020–2022) →

London Property Market 2016–2019: What Brexit Did to Prices

Between the Brexit referendum (June 2016) and the onset of COVID (early 2020), London property markets produced some of the dullest headline numbers in living memory. The London-wide median transaction price per square metre rose from £5,761/sqm to £5,829/sqm over three and a half years — a nominal gain of just +1.2%. For a city that had tripled in price over the previous two decades, this felt like stagnation.

It was not stagnation. Our hedonic factor model — which strips out shifts in the mix of properties transacting and isolates quality-adjusted price changes — tells a different story. And beneath the flat headline, one factor was quietly undergoing one of its largest moves in the entire dataset.

Data source: HM Land Registry Price Paid Data & MHCLG EPC bulk download, modelled via rolling 3-month cross-sectional OLS. All factor returns below are computed within this period only (not from any earlier baseline).

Quality-Adjusted Prices Rose +13.7%

The headline median disguises compositional effects: the mix of what sold changed. Controlling for property type, size, location, energy rating and construction period, the baseline market factor rose +13.7% during this period. That is not spectacular, but it is not stagnation either — it is broadly in line with general inflation over the same period. The market was treading water in real terms, not falling.

The gap between the +1.2% nominal print and the +13.7% quality-adjusted number is explained by a shift in transaction mix: more small flats, fewer large houses, more outer-London activity — all of which depress the simple median even when underlying values are rising.

The Flat Premium Fell 5 Points

The most significant factor move of this period — and a foreshadowing of what came next — was the erosion of the flat premium. In mid-2016 flats commanded a +10.5% premium over equivalent houses (same postcode, same floor area, same energy rating). By October 2019 that had contracted to +5.9%: a fall of 4.9%.

Given that London's market is disproportionately composed of flats, particularly in inner zones, this relative underperformance was a direct drag on the widely-watched average price indices. Owners of houses, especially in outer London, had a materially better experience during these years than owners of flats — even if they never saw it in the headlines.

New Builds: A Slightly Wider Discount

The new-build factor also deteriorated modestly. New builds moved from roughly par to a discount of -1.1% relative to equivalent second-hand stock during this period. Help to Buy was sustaining volumes but not protecting resale values relative to the broader market.

Factor Returns, Brexit to Pre-COVID (May 2016 to October 2019)

FactorPeriod returnDirection
Baseline Market+13.7%Quality-adjusted prices rose despite flat nominal
Flat Premium-4.9%Flats lost ground vs equivalent houses
Floor Area-3.6%Per-sqm value of extra space began fading
Energy Score-1.1%Green premium not yet pricing in
New Build-1.1%Slightly wider discount vs second-hand
Freehold+0.8%Marginal tailwind for houses

Factor returns, May 2016 – October 2019

What It Meant for Owners

If you owned a house rather than a flat, you experienced roughly +13.7% quality-adjusted appreciation plus a +0.8% freehold tailwind. If you owned a new-build flat, you had the flat discount widen (-4.9%) and the new-build discount widen (-1.1%) simultaneously — a double headwind that offset much of the baseline gain.

The seeds of the post-COVID flat discount were planted here. The flat premium did not collapse overnight in 2022: it had been eroding for at least three years before the pandemic began.

How did your postcode perform?

Enter any London postcode to see its quality-adjusted price history, factor contributions, and how it compares to the London average.

Analyse a Postcode →

Next: The COVID Boom

The flat headline of 2016–2019 gave way to something very different: a rapid +14% nominal surge concentrated entirely in outer London, as buyers left Zone 1 in search of space. Read Part 2 →

Methodology

Factor returns are derived from a rolling 3-month cross-sectional OLS regression of log(price/sqm) on eight property characteristics, run on every Land Registry transaction matched to an EPC certificate. The intercept (Baseline Market) captures quality-adjusted market-wide appreciation; other factors show how the market price of each characteristic evolved. All returns here are computed within this period only. See the factors page for full definitions.